TEACHERS‘ HEALTH IN MOISTURE-DAMAGED SCHOOLS -- A FOLLOW-UP STUDY PDF Print E-mail

This study is one example of scores on the topic that we have archived in this section. Most are Premium Content, please click here to learn how to access them.

TEACHERS‘ HEALTH IN MOISTURE-DAMAGED SCHOOLS
- A FOLLOW-UP STUDY
http://www.uku.fi/vaitokset/2005/isbn951-740-503-0.pdf
Riitta-Liisa Patovirta
National Public Health Institute
Department of Environmental Health
P.O.Box 95, FI-70701 Kuopio, Finland
and
University of Kuopio
Department of Pulmonary Diseases
P.O.Box 1777, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland

 

Patovirta Riitta-Liisa. Teachers‘ health in moisture-damaged schools – a follow-up study. Publications

of the National Public Health Institute A5/2005. 130 p. ISBN 951-740-503-0, ISSN 0359-3584, ISSN

1458-6290 (PDF-version).

 

This thesis deals with adverse health effects on teachers in moisture- and moulddamaged

schools before and after building remediation. This was an intervention

study where bronchial reactivity and immunological resposes were measured

clinically and subjects filled in symptom questionnaires. Classification into moistureand

mould-damaged buildings and non-damaged buildings was based on technical

and microbiological measurements of the building before and after remediation

parallel to the health study.

In the first part of the study, the health effects among teachers in a mould-damaged

school before, during and after extensive remediation were assessed by collecting

health data three times with a self-reported symptom questionnaire from the teachers

in that school (n=31) and from a reference group of teachers working in a nondamaged

school. The questionnaire included about 70 questions on general and

respiratory irritation symptoms, respiratory infections, allergic diseases and medical

treatment. At the end of the remediation and two and three years later, spirometry was

measured; and at the end of the remediation and two years later mould-specific

immunoglobulin G antibodies were determined twice from 26 teachers by enzymelinked

immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

In the second part of the study, teachers (n=52) at the different mould-damaged

schools made serial measurements of peak expiratory flow (PEF) three times a day

during a three week-period; the second week was winter holiday (non-exposed) week.

Three out of four moisture- and mould-damaged schools were selected for the followup

study, and teachers (n=56) took part in a self-administered symptom survey before

and one year after remediation of the buildings. The questionnaire was the same as in

the first study.

In the first part of the study, a cluster of asthma was identified, the prevalence of

asthma being 26% and three of the cases diagnosed as occupational disease caused by

exposure to fungi. Among the index group symptoms of bronchitis (p=0.03),

conjunctivitis (p=0.02) and fatigue (p=0.02) decreased after remediation. During the

three-year follow-up, the lung function levels of the index school teachers remained at

the same normal level. Nor was there any significant change in IgG-antibody

concentrations between index and reference groups or during the follow-up study.

However, for ten out of twenty moulds, an association was found between elevated

mould-specific IgG antibodies and sinusitis.

As a result of the second part of the study, in the mornings, afternoons and evenings

the means of the weekly PEF-levels were found to be slightly, but significantly,

reduced between the second holiday week and the third week. In the intervention

study, self-reported fatigue (OR=0.2) and headache (OR=0.4) were reported to

decrease. Female gender was a risk factor for sinusitis, age over 40 years was a risk

for voice problems and more than ten years at the same school was a risk for

conjunctivitis and headache.

In conclusion, mould remediation of the school building had positive effects on

teachers` health. The effect was seen as a decrease in general symptoms and in

respiratory infections. No new cases of asthma were found after remediation.

Exposure-induced symptoms appeared to be reversible. Significant risk factors for

health outcomes were female gender, age and a working history of more than ten

years at the same school. In non-asthmatic teachers, a minor but significant decrease

was found in PEF-levels during the exposure period. Based on the results of this

study, spirometry was not sensitive enough to detect changes in lung function after

mould remediation. Futhermore, IgG-antibodies did not appear to be a useful

biomarker for decrease in exposure due to successful remediation of a work

environment.

 
< Prev   Next >